A friend of mine stuck in New Jersey for the rest of his life complains about his nine year old daughter's need for a thirty dollar wig for her cheer leading group. Aside from the usual quips about Jersey girls, I do have sympathy for his middle-age, middle class plight.
A recent ruling in upstate New York has determined that cheerleaders must also be present at girls sporting events in order to comply with the fairness provisions of Title 9. While some whole heartedly support this idea and others are baffled by it, I'll take a different stand and say eliminate the sports programs altogether.
To quote Wikipedia: Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (United States), commonly known as Title IX, is a 37-word law enacted on June 23, 1972 that states: "No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.
I wrote a piece a little over a year ago urging public schools to consider banning football. The idea was not that the sport was too big of a risk for students and districts alike, but rather that expenditure for it is unfair to those who cannot perform under those expectations. What if Johnny isn't good enough to make the team or Jane isn't pretty/athletic enough to cheer ? The parents of these children still are forced to pay for the extra circular activities of the more special or talented. Most will respond that debate, music or chess clubs are available to those who cannot perform under these circumstances. Some could do both and not succumb to classic stereotypes and beliefs which make the quarterback BMOC. The prissy cheer leading and sports types of the fifties and sixties still has deep resonance in our modern culture.
My point is simple. If I am forced by the government to educate other's children, do I have to support the 'jock' or vanity culture ? English and math maybe fine for all students, but not every kid can be on the 'team'. Nor can every child play the violin or piano. Scholastic sports used to be the province of 'clubs'. Volunteers and donations sustained these activities a hundred years ago. Why am I urging children to be yelled at and cajoled to conform and perform with the slim chance that they could become one of the college or professional elite who derive status or income based on their ability to perform for the facile masses too lazy or unskilled to play themselves ?
The idea that cheerleaders must now also support both genders is as absurd as the initial concept to begin with. Taking part as a group and identifying with school spirit and the like causes resentment and alienation amongst others. While most parents accept these barriers and restrictions, untold thousands are left out of the process and are forced to watch jock and fashion cultures rule the day. Aside from the obvious knee-jerk libertarian reaction to tax spending and the like, a basic issue of overall fairness has been completely blindsided by a culture obsessed with winning at simple athletic pursuits rather then a blend of what the Greeks called Arete. Healthy and strong engineers, doctors and just regular people should be the by-product of our educational process regardless of how its funded. Irrational lawmaking and equally silly decisions trap us in a fold that can only be a source of concern for the rest of the civilized world.
Comments (2)
I think I recall a local school, about a year ago or so, that cut all of the sports because the budget could not be voted in, so they when with a basic budget. They got enough support from the community to get the sports programs up and running again. I can't find any information on it, but it suports your blog totally.
Posted by Chuck | November 27, 2006 3:13 PM
Posted on November 27, 2006 15:13
A national health promotion and disease prevention initiative bringing together many individuals and agencies to improve the health of all Americans.
Posted by Leo | January 21, 2007 3:11 PM
Posted on January 21, 2007 15:11