<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Eric Sundwall</title>
      <link>http://www.sundwall4congress.org/</link>
      <description>Libertarian in upstate New York</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:56:03 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

      
      <item>
         <title>Damn Those Speculators ! </title>
         <description><![CDATA[ Congresswoman Gillibrand is baffled that someone would tell her that high oil prices aren't caused by the <a href="http://www.registerstar.com/articles/2008/06/25/news/news02.txt">evil speculators</a>.  Of course do-gooder lawyers would always reach for the regulatory button when confronted with any problem. It's their job after all. 

Bob Murphy has a <a href="https://mises.org/story/2819">great article</a> about this over at the Mises site. Murphy's point ? 

<em>The crucial point to remember is that there is nothing magical about government officials. There is no intrinsic reason to expect them to better forecast future disruptions in oil imports. </em>

I know this rings hollow for all those afflicted with governmentis, but the idea that the strategic reserve (and even the Federal Reserve) is something that the government can control or eliminate will simply never be on the table for these types. ]]></description>
         <link>http://www.sundwall4congress.org/2008/06/damn_those_speculators.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.sundwall4congress.org/2008/06/damn_those_speculators.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Campaign Coverage</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Gillibrand</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Oil</category>
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:56:03 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Paying the Piper</title>
         <description><![CDATA[At the end of what would be my failed attempt to get on the ballot in the 2006 campaign, the LPNY Senatorial candidate, Jeff Russell and I <a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=m5uFMZSGS-M">crashed a MoveOn.org event</a>. The purpose and the tone of the event was a criticism of the war on Iraq and a display of the opportunity cost for the district if the tax dollars stayed at home. <span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="piper.jpg" src="http://www.sundwall4congress.org/resources/piper.jpg" width="208" height="292" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 20px 20px 0;" /></span>

While we were there to criticize Hillary Clinton and John Sweeney for their support of the war , there were a couple cat calls in regard to the current Congresswoman Kirsten Gillibrand. She obviously had not taken a strong enough position against the war and the leftists and brave progressives were taking her to task about it. While its not very puzzling strategically to see why the Gillibrand campaign avoided this event, it remains equally dubious that the current mailer her five offices has mailed out amounts to fiddling with the tax code in light of the major crisis that Empire has driven. While it stresses property tax relief, one has to wonder whether the current CongressCritter would have been suited for the Assembly or State Senate instead of waddling around under the auspices of the nation's Capitol. It was a question many asked of me as I was running. My answer was always . . 'the war, the war'. 

If you're still with with me on this post, which have been rare and infrequent here, here's an in depth criticism of the whole approach. Of course I saved the top shelf stuff for the <a href="http://ericsundwall.com">real blog</a>. This hardly seemed like worthwhile there, but it was something that had to be said in case there are a few willing donors to pop a few grand off a piece for another insurgent effort  that dealt with the war and the trillions of dollars of  unfunded mandates that our children and grandchildren are stuck with . . . . ]]></description>
         <link>http://www.sundwall4congress.org/2008/04/paying_the_piper.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.sundwall4congress.org/2008/04/paying_the_piper.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">National Debt</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">War</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Gillibrand</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">War</category>
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:21:52 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Capital Outsider Website</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Please visit <a href="http://capitaloutsider.org">http://capitaloutsider.org </a>

<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="capout5a.jpg" src="http://www.sundwall4congress.org/resources/capout5a.jpg" width="324" height="175" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 20px 20px 0;"/></span>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.sundwall4congress.org/2007/09/capital_outsider_website.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.sundwall4congress.org/2007/09/capital_outsider_website.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2007 21:51:18 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Capital Outsider: Warren Redlich </title>
         <description><![CDATA[Warren Redlich was our first official guest on Capital Outsider this past week. Special thanks to Warren for this appearance and the help he gave that 'libertarian' candidate last year. 

<embed style="width:400px; height:326px;" id="VideoPlayback" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docId=5041068509421699515&hl=en" flashvars=""> </embed>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.sundwall4congress.org/2007/09/capital_outsider_warren_redlic.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.sundwall4congress.org/2007/09/capital_outsider_warren_redlic.html</guid>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Redlich</category>
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 12:13:22 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Capital Outsider </title>
         <description><![CDATA[Former and current State Chairman of the LPNY, Bill McMillen & Jeff Russell are featured on a new public policy program called Capital Outsider. Here's some clips from our pilot program. Bill ran for Senate in 1998 and Jeff last year against Hillary. 

<embed style="width:400px; height:326px;" id="VideoPlayback" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docId=3685570831575009133&hl=en" flashvars=""> </embed>

We hope to refine our skills, presentation and line up new and exciting guests in the months to come. Thanks to <a href="http://www.sacctv.org/">Schenectady Public Access</a> for allowing us to start this exciting project. ]]></description>
         <link>http://www.sundwall4congress.org/2007/07/capital_outsider.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.sundwall4congress.org/2007/07/capital_outsider.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 11:24:21 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Papa Joe &amp; the Rich Kid too . . .</title>
         <description><![CDATA[All my life it's always been the Republicans blaming the downstate Democrats and vice versa. The naive expectation that somehow Eliot Spitzer could walk into Albany and transform politics as usual makes me happy that the 5200 signatures we collected last summer for the LPNY effort was not as futile as the current regimes are making it. Even after plundering the taxpayers of 120+ billion dollars, they're still bickering about stuff. <img alt="eliot_joe.jpg" src="http://www.sundwall4congress.org/resources/eliot_joe.jpg" width="190" height="160" class="postimg" />

Didn't everybody get what they wanted ? Who got left behind ? Helicopters, police details and all types of chicanery are the talk of the town. Nobody that I come across cares or is even paying attention. I'm always embarrassed to be from NY wherever I go. Between Hillary & Chuck and any other typical pol, people in Texas & California are amazed at us and happy they're not here. ]]></description>
         <link>http://www.sundwall4congress.org/2007/07/papa_joe_the_rich_kid_too.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.sundwall4congress.org/2007/07/papa_joe_the_rich_kid_too.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 13:48:10 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Rabble in Arms</title>
         <description><![CDATA[  There's a lot of chatter about libertarian GOP candidate Ron Paul. The upcoming prospect that he may have raised 2.4 million doesn't put him in the Obama netroots category, but the average GOP folks don't have as much experience as the other side. Whatever online support, YouTube viewers or whatever metric one wants to attribute or take away from the campaign, he is getting MSM coverage. That's something no declared Libertarian candidate can ever really claim.<img alt="minutemen.jpg" src="http://www.sundwall4congress.org/resources/minutemen.jpg" width="260" height="362" class="postimg" />

While there are prominent naysayers in the LP camp over Dr. Paul, the spirit of the Ron Paul supporters is something to be carefully watched. The creative videos and quasi-commercials on the Net may never reach the encrusted GOP'ers in paneling graced family rooms with land lines who get most of those random poll calls, but those willing to go out and reach out is increasing. This seems more so than any other 'second-tier' candidate as some in the elite core of the MSM like to call them. The question for us hardcore LP'ers is not whether we can compete with the Paul campaign, but is whether this enthusiastic rabble in arms not in the clutches of corporatism and special interests will have any interest beyond the brief glimpse and hope that Paul offers in terms of message. ]]></description>
         <link>http://www.sundwall4congress.org/2007/07/rabble_in_arms.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.sundwall4congress.org/2007/07/rabble_in_arms.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 09:46:15 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Another Unreasonable Man: Alan Chartock</title>
         <description><![CDATA[  Tuesday morning I caught a stint on WAMC about Patriotism and Dr. Cahrtock was a guest. While people called in with their conception and definitions of Patriotism, an otherwise innocuous show on July 3rd, Chartock and some callers took the opportunity to bash non-voters. The idea being that unless you have indeed voted, any thought or protest in regard to government was illegitimate. Thus blaming any aspect of government and democracy for our ills requires one to vote. <img alt="alan_ralph.jpg" src="http://www.sundwall4congress.org/resources/alan_ralph.jpg" width="210" height="160" class="postimg"/>
    
   While it's obvious that this doctor of communications and politics is not familiar with the concept of <a href="http://www.lewrockwell.com/dilorenzo/dilorenzo103.html">consent withdrawn</a> and its electoral relationship to voters, the underlying theme for Alan on frequent occasions is that even voting third party is wrong when someone as evil and wrong as Bush can assume power and drag us into conflicts like Iraq. In many ways I opted out of voting for Harry Browne a second time for Ralph Nader precisely because of this elitist tripe that is peddled at every opportunity by charlatans like Chartock. ]]></description>
         <link>http://www.sundwall4congress.org/2007/07/another_unreasonable_man_alan.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.sundwall4congress.org/2007/07/another_unreasonable_man_alan.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 12:54:21 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>FDR &amp; FUD</title>
         <description><![CDATA[As I listened to Fred Dicker ( advertised as; State politics with an unbiased voice. Fred gives a thorough and unbiased look into the world of New York politics each weekday morning) gush about FDR on WROW, I'm glad historians like Ralph Raico have put some pen to paper about some of the qualities of <a href="http://www.lewrockwell.com/raico/fdr-1.html">history and FDR</a> that Fred ignores. Apparently 'ol FDR is being invoked by the broadcasters hall of fame in order to shore up some of the funds necessary to complete their tax payer funded <a href="http://www.sj-r.com/sections/news/stories/117811.asp">multi-million dollar HQ</a>. <img alt="fdr.jpg" src="http://www.sundwall4congress.org/resources/fdr.jpg" width="285" height="375" class="postimg"/>

Despite having grandparents who lived in the Depression, we never had the resounding statist lessons of FDR or JFK foisted into our impressionable little heads. In fact my one grandfather always called JFK's dad a rum runner and my grandmother always cackled that my generation would never see a dime of Social Security. I'm hoping to send my checks back if I ever reach that age ( 67 now?). Of particular note is FDR's role in Latin America and his role in the Newport RI naval investigations. ]]></description>
         <link>http://www.sundwall4congress.org/2007/07/fdr_fud.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.sundwall4congress.org/2007/07/fdr_fud.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 16:57:26 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Kirsten&apos;s Keynsian Kool-aid</title>
         <description><![CDATA[   Congresswoman Gillibrand has suddenly seen the light with regard to <a href="http://www.poughkeepsiejournal.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070622/OPINION/706220311/1004/NEWS">fiscal responsibility</a>. Apparently our freshman Congress person feels like proposing a balanced budget amendment as part of her valuable time in the Washington. <img alt="keynes.jpg" src="http://www.sundwall4congress.org/resources/keynes.jpg" width="305" height="363" class="postimg"/> 

   While Kirsten may pay lip service to the obvious problems of a 9 trillion dollar debt, little examination is placed on the area of unfunded future mandates (that tune runs over 50 trillion by some conservative estimates). On the campaign trail last year she was touting an Apollo like project for alternative Energy and promising a host of provisions for health care etc. So far she's supported subsidized agri-business (dairy compact) and wage price controls (minimum wage) and there's probably no end to the goodies list her progressive supporters demand on a daily basis. Aside from the general economic theories of debt (see after the jump), one can easily point to another 120 billion wasted in Iraq as part of an effort to placate conservative voters in the district. Will there be any future candidate willing to support lower spending, rather than a convoluted constitutional process ? Unless yours truly considers another bid (that post coming soon) it's doubtful the GOP will field such a candidate. After all, Sandy Treadwell is all about other people's money too.  ]]></description>
         <link>http://www.sundwall4congress.org/2007/06/kirstens_keynsian_koolaid.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.sundwall4congress.org/2007/06/kirstens_keynsian_koolaid.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Liberty Ideas</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 10:19:44 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Do Progressives Get It ?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<em><a href="http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/06/09/1770/">Some do.</a> </em>They can appreciate the lacuna between a group that fights a false war and those who call for it's end. When Dr. Paul called out Rudy with principle and reason in the second GOP debate, he remained just as consistent in the third by declaring the doctrine of preemptive war unjust and immoral. As his popularity <a href="http://snapshot.compete.com/ronpaul2008.com+hillaryclinton.com+barackobama.com+joinrudy2008.com+mittromney.com?metric=vel">snowballs</a> in what was the sole province of progressive netroots activism , that group (<a href="http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ODIyYzRiMWZiZjg4NWRmNGRjYzg1YmZlNjFlYWU0OTg=&w=MQ==">and others</a>) is now reacting against the libertarian movement in general. While I have few doubts of the libertarian's position (especially the economic ones) and it's ultimate verity, especially in relation to "<a href="http://blog.mises.org/archives/006729.asp">Progressivism</a>", it's worthy to note that they are indeed reacting where once they may have been conveniently ignored or dismissed as unrealistical, extremist, the Paul candidacy. <img alt="Intellectual.jpeg" src="http://www.ericsundwall.com/resources/Intellectual.jpeg" width="258" height="300" class="postimg"/>

 <em><a href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/5/15/124912/740">Some don't get it</a></em>. They have been hardened by the vitriolic rancor of bi-partisan rule and engage in tactics which seek to vilify and discredit the person rather than the ideas. While it may be possible to review the legislative record of an individual over the years and <a href="http://www.thedailybackground.com/2007/06/08/a-progressive-viewpoint-on-ron-paul/">cherry pick issues</a> that fit into an <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/6/7/125244/7379">indignant diary</a> or <a href="http://thenewliberty.com/?p=196">YouTube post</a> with <a href="http://www.atlantaprogressivenews.com/views/0024-views.html">little regard</a> to the possible reasons or justification. Perhaps us third and fourth tier commentators have little influence on the process which ultimately favors celebrity, money and false hype. There is a realistic eye to be cast on the <a href="http://cornellsun.com/node/23506">online fussing</a> about the Paul campaign. One wonders if <a href="http://www.reason.com/blog/show/120672.html">Kent Snyder</a> has the acumen to grow and develop the effort like Joe Trippi did for the other unknown doctor who rocked the Net in the last POTUS race, polls and plain old regular]]></description>
         <link>http://www.sundwall4congress.org/2007/06/do_progressives_get_it.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.sundwall4congress.org/2007/06/do_progressives_get_it.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 23:27:04 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Debating Xenophobia &amp; Socialized Medicine</title>
         <description><![CDATA[  As one of those disparaged political outsiders its very hard to watch the Red & Blue debates and feel any satisfaction or hope that my outlook will ever be reflected on any large scale. As enrollment declines in both major parties, a large poll of non-affiliated voters just wait for the inevitable choice between which side of the head they will be struck on. The other half of the American voters opt out altogether and are vilified by self-righteous followers of a system declaring their ambivalence some sort cancer on democracy.<img alt="slap.gif" src="http://www.sundwall4congress.org/resources/slap.gif" width="400" height="238" class="postimg"/> 

 Watching the CNN debates this last week amplified two prominent issues. The GOP seems hell bent on a fence for Mexico's border and the Dems are splitting hairs about universal health care. While neither issue will be as important as the trillion dollar war on terror, each carries its own political baggage . . . ]]></description>
         <link>http://www.sundwall4congress.org/2007/06/debating_xenophobia_socialized.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.sundwall4congress.org/2007/06/debating_xenophobia_socialized.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Campaign Coverage</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 11:30:03 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Rachel&apos;s Ray</title>
         <description><![CDATA[ Libertarians are slightly more enthusiastic during this bout of presidential ho-hum. By this time next year it may just be the inevitable lock step to government subsidized conventions. Former 1988 LP presidential candidate Ron Paul is shaking up the field with his anti-war, pro free market and individual liberty message. While the LP will make do with a candidate good for our average half a million votes, there still seems to be some sort of <a href="http://www.prweb.com/releases/2007/6/prweb529760.htm">Ron Paul base</a> which may or may not affect the GOP primaries. 

<object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/p8rsMhQUFkA"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/p8rsMhQUFkA" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>

Libertarian activist <a href="http://www.libertyforall.net/?p=443">Rachel Mills</a> is getting some high views on her YouTube site. Rachel gained some press back in 2003 for her participation in 'Ladies for Liberty', a sort of pinup calendar for libertarians. She's come out as a rather vocal and refreshing voice for liberty with these commentaries/skits. While I'll tow the LP line, especially in an overwhelmingly red state, it will be fun to watch passionate advocates like her succeed in the new medium. Check out her spoof with the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jhu_R8FgAnc">Bard</a>. ]]></description>
         <link>http://www.sundwall4congress.org/2007/06/rachels_ray.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.sundwall4congress.org/2007/06/rachels_ray.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 08:17:11 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>New York&apos;s &apos;In-Valids&apos;</title>
         <description><![CDATA[ Lifetime legal dude, Eliot Spitzer, is trying to make the law now. After a career of enforcing it, we're now subject to the grand philosophy which guides its making now. The legislature is considering a bill which would make all convicted felons and those who have committed misdemeanors subject to forfeiture of their DNA. While this is being lauded by <a href="http://www.oag.state.ny.us/press/statements/dna_testing.html">law enforcement</a> and <a href="http://www.democratandchronicle.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070527/OPINION04/705270328/1041/OPINION">media editorials</a>. This New Yorker in the individual freedom wilderness is saying enough is enough. <img alt="dna.JPG" src="http://www.ericsundwall.com/resources/dna.JPG" width="250" height="206" class="postimg"/>

   The 1997 movie <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gattaca">Gattaca</a> told a story about a future and society that revolved around <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_eugenics">new eugenics</a>. It's a frightful tale about a young man trying to buck a fixed system in order to achieve the dream of space travel. Like everything else in NY it often heralds a bigger picture for the world, witness <a href="http://www.cmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070528/REPOSITORY/705280327/1029/OPINION03">seatbelt laws</a> and <a href="http://www.courier-journal.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070529/OPINION01/705290353">trans-fat bans</a>. If my potential or future civil disobedience is threatened with a test which could effect employment, life insurenace or any other price to just living in an unfree world, I hereby call for a Genetic Bill of Rights. ]]></description>
         <link>http://www.sundwall4congress.org/2007/05/new_yorks_invalids.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.sundwall4congress.org/2007/05/new_yorks_invalids.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 17:23:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Kirsten Dunced &apos;Em</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<em>Dunce -1577, from earlier Duns disciple "follower of John Duns Scotus" (c. 1265-1308), Scot. scholar of philosophy and theology supposed to have been born at Duns in Berwickshire. By 16c., humanist reaction against medieval theology singled him out as the type of the hairsplitting scholastic. It became a term of reproach to more conservative philosophical opponents c.1527, later extended to any dull-witted student.</em><img alt="dunce.jpg" src="http://www.sundwall4congress.org/resources/dunce.jpg" width="300" height="300" class="postimg"/>

Aside from the recent announcement of Morris Guller to primary Representative Gillibrand in 2008, apparently the 'progressives' are a little tight about the recent vote to continue the occupation of Iraq despite efforts to <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/5/26/122346/256">deflect criticism by the devoted 'devtob'. </a>

Apparently Citizen Action, scheduled a BBQ with representative Gillibrand at Grafton State Park  a few weeks ago and she had to face a disappointed group of MoveOn types just after the vote to continue funding. Apparently the good Congresswoman cited her placement on the Armed Services Committee and the possibility of a veto that would only cause the troops to suffer more. It seems that not enough Republicans take the Ron Paul stance of non-interventionist foreign policy and thus are to blame for her vote. It's hard to figure out the extent of their disappointment given the fact that as many as four other anti-war candidates stepped forward rather quickly once Gillibrand's tepid position on the 'war' was revealed after her official announcements early last year. ]]></description>
         <link>http://www.sundwall4congress.org/2007/05/kirsten_dunced_em.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.sundwall4congress.org/2007/05/kirsten_dunced_em.html</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 17:01:12 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
